MN692 Capstone Project T1 Assignment Help Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines
Trimester
T1 2026
Unit Code
MN692
Unit Title
Capstone Project
Assessment Type
Assessment 1 – Group Report and Individual Report
Assessment Title
Project Detailed Design
Purpose of the
assessment (with ULO Mapping)
Students should be able to demonstrate their achievements in the following unit learning outcomes:
a. Demonstrate the ability to conceptualise, research, design, plan and execute a substantial capstone project
b. Adapt and apply the knowledge and skills acquired over the core units of the course in planning and executing a capstone project in an area related to Networking
e. Demonstrate the application of knowledge and skills with a high level of personal autonomy and accountability while being part of a team-based working environment.
Weight
10% of the total assessment
Total Marks
100% equals the full 10 marks
Final Mark = Group Report Mark x Individual Report Mark
Word limit
N/A
Due Date
Group Report: Week 3, Sunday, 5 April 2026, 23:59 PM
Individual Report: Week 3, Sunday, 5 April 2026, 23:59 PM
Submission
Guidelines
Including the Use of Gen AI Tools
• All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date.
• The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Roboto font, and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. The group written report must adhere to the provided template style.
• Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using the IEEE referencing style. • Late submission penalty: a penalty of 10% (of total available marks) per day, 0% score for more than 5 days late submission.
• Students must ensure before submission of the final version of the assignment that the similarity percentage as computed by Turnitin must be less than 10%. Assignments with more than 10% similarity may not be considered for marking.
• GENERATIVE AI USE IS PROHIBITED: The student is expected to complete this assessment without using automated tools.
Extension
If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly on AMS. You must submit this application three working days prior to the due date of the assignment. Further information is available at:
Academic
Misconduct
Academic Misconduct is a serious offense. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at:
. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description.
MN692 Capstone Project T1 Assessment 2 Assignments Help
ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION The MN692 Capstone Project builds on the work completed in MN690 Research Methods and Project Management from the previous trimester, but only if you retain the same group members in your tutorial session. If your team composition changes, you may be assigned a new topic and will be required to complete the project implementation accordingly. Please note that MN692 involves working with a real industry client, typically on a topic that aligns closely with your MN690 project.
The industry project report consists of two distinct stages. The first stage focuses on the project’s detailed design, while the second stage involves its implementation and analysis. Each stage requires the submission of both group and individual reports, contributing to Assessments 1 and 2.
Individual marks for each team member will be calculated for each assessment using the following process:
• Group marks for the written report will be assigned based on the group report assignment. • Each team member will receive an individual mark for the individual report assignment, which will be scaled by a factor of 1.
• The final mark for each student will be determined by multiplying the group report mark by this scaled individual mark.
• Failure to submit an individual report will result in a score of 0 for the student.
The group report must be submitted solely by the designated leader through the assigned group submission link. Individual reports should be submitted separately via the specified link. Only the assigned group leader is responsible for submitting the required files through the Moodle assignment submission link. Ensure that the full report is submitted, including all required contents starting from the cover page. Penalties will be applied in cases where multiple students submit highly similar files, as this may be regarded as plagiarism.
Note: If you need help with any assignment from Melbourne Institute of Technology, Gradespire provides complete support with high-quality solutions, expert guidance, and timely delivery to help you achieve better academic results.
GROUP ASSIGNMENT TASK In this phase, your goal is to complete both Section 1 (Introduction) and Section 2 (Project Detailed Design) of your industry report. Ensure to attach the required documents for Appendix 1, Industry Client Information. Make sure to follow the provided final report template diligently, as it outlines the necessary structure for your report.
Introduction [20% Mark] Briefly describe your project, including its purpose, objectives, industry client information, and key challenges. If you completed the MN690 on a similar topic, summarise your previous work, highlighting research findings and design decisions. If you are starting with a new topic at this stage, provide background information on the project, including its scope, industry relevance, and initial requirements or constraints identified before implementation. Additionally, provide a concise outline of the report.
Detailed Project Design [70% Mark] This section presents a detailed project plan outlining key tasks and deliverables to ensure effective implementation. A structured approach enhances coordination by covering critical aspects such as block diagram implementation, software and hardware requirements, team responsibilities, and weekly activities, as detailed below:
• Implementation Overview [30% Mark] You are required to provide a high-level overview of the implementation process, outlining the chosen methodology, key project phases, and a block diagram illustrating the system architecture. This section should clearly explain how the project will be executed in alignment with the project proposal provided by the industry client.
• Software and Hardware Requirements [20% Mark] This section outlines the essential tools and resources required for the project before detailing the execution plan. The requirements can be categorised into software and hardware specifications.
• Weekly Activities and Team Responsibilities Plan [20% Mark] This section outlines the weekly activities timeline and team roles and responsibilities for MN692. It includes a detailed table mapping out weekly activities with a comprehensive timeline for task completion. Additionally, it defines the roles and responsibilities of each team member, ensuring clear articulation of contributions and expectations to promote effective coordination.
Reference and Presentation [10% Mark] Each student is required to provide at least three references from sources published within the past five years. Ensure that your report is meticulously structured, with proper formatting, accurate spelling and grammar, adherence to the IEEE reference style, and a well-designed cover page and table of contents. Before submission, thoroughly review your template and remove all provided instructional content, keeping only the section headings. This step is essential to prevent high similarity in your assessment.
Check Now: MN692 Capstone Project Assignment Help
GROUP ASSIGNMENT MARKING CRITERIA Section
Description
Marks (%)
Introduction
• Clearly describe the project’s purpose, objectives, industry relevance, client information, and key challenges. • Summarise MN690 findings (if applicable) or provide background, scope, and constraints for new topics. • Present a well-organised report outline with clear, concise, and professional writing.
20%
Detailed Project
Design
Implementation Overview
• Provide a high-level overview of the implementation process, including the methodology, key project phases, and a block diagram representing the system architecture.
Software and Hardware Requirements
• Provide a list of all the required software along with their detailed specifications and appropriate references. • Provide a list of all the required hardware along with their detailed specifications and appropriate references.
Weekly Activities and Team Responsibilities Plan • Develop a table outlining weekly activities with a comprehensive timeline for task completion during this implementation stage.
• Define and specify the roles and responsibilities of each team member at this stage of the project.
30%
20%
20%
References &
Presentation
• Each student must provide at least three references from sources published within the past five years, adhering to the IEEE reference style.
• Adhere to the prescribed template presentation format.
10%
Industry Client
Information
• Provide the industry client details, including the signatures of both the client and, if different, the contact person.
HURDLE
Total
100% (10)
GROUP ASSIGNMENT MARKING RUBRIC Grades
=80%
High Distinction
70%-79%
Distinction
60% – 69%
Credit
50% – 59%
Pass
<50%
Fail
Introduction
Clear, well
structured,
concise, and
professionally written. Strong justification
with all
required
details.
Well-written
with relevant
details and
good structure. Minor gaps in justification or clarity.
Covers the
basics but
lacks depth in explanation or clarity. Some inconsistenci es.
Limited details with poor
structure and weak
justification.
Needs
significant
improvement.
Inadequate,
unclear, or
missing key
components. Does not meet requirements.
Detailed
Project
Design
Comprehensi ve, well
structured, and detailed
explanation
with strong
justifications.
Well-organised with relevant
information but may have minor gaps in
explanation.
Meets basic requirements but lacks
clarity,
structure, or depth in some areas.
Covers
essential
elements but is
disorganised, incomplete, or lacking strong justifications.
Poorly
structured,
missing
details, or
lacks clear
diagram. Does not meet
expectations.
References & Presentation
Fully adheres to the template, with at least
three high
quality
references per student.
Follows the
template but
may have minor issues with
formatting or
reference
quality.
Includes
references
but lacks
consistency, quality, or
proper
formatting.
Incomplete
references,
weak
formatting, or not fully
aligned with
the template.
Missing or very poor
references,
incorrect
formatting, or does not
follow the
template.
Industry
Client
Information
HURDLE
This is a mandatory requirement; students must submit the industry client details, including the signatures of both the client and, if different, the contact person.
INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT TASK Standards of Conduct for Student Project [HURDLE] This is a mandatory task where students are required to complete and sign the Standards of Conduct for Student Project form. You can find the form at the bottom of this page. Ensure you sign it and submit it on Moodle by the end of Week 1, Sunday. Failing to submit on time will result in a 10% penalty for Assignment 1. If the submission is not received by the Assignment 1 due date, a score of 0 will be assigned. It’s essential to note that Assessment 1 will not be graded without the submission of this Standards of Conduct.
Participation (Week 1-3) [66.67% Mark] Attendance and active participation in lectures and tutorials are mandatory for the individual component MN692. Punctuality is of utmost importance in this unit. Students are granted a 10-minute grace period; however, beyond this timeframe, a comment (instead of a checkmark) will be noted on their AMS attendance record. It is required that students provide a screenshot of their attendance for the lectures and tutorial from Weeks 1 to 3. Each recorded attendance contributes to a total of 6 marks, accounting for 66.67% of the total individual assignment marks.
SPARKPLUS Self and Peer Assessment (Week 1-3) [33.33% Mark] SPARKPLUS is an essential tool for Self & Peer Assessment and Feedback in the context of group assignments, accessible at. Completion of this task is mandatory for all students, and the SPARKPLUS score directly contributes to determining the final assignment mark, especially for this specific section. The SPARKPLUS website calculates this score promptly upon completion of the review task by all group members. The system automatically generates the score once all group members have completed their reviews. Final scores will be reviewed and moderated by the tutor or lecturer, taking into account each student’s weekly progress and individual contributions during lectures and tutorials.
Familiarise yourself with the usage of SPARKPLUS by referring to the Student’s SPARKPLUS Guideline located in the assignment folder. Ensure that you provide comments justifying your rating, as a 50% penalty mark will be imposed if adequate comments are not provided for this section. It is crucial to emphasise that failure to submit the SPARKPLUS review will result in a zero mark for this section. Additionally, capture a full-screen screenshot demonstrating the completion of your rating; an alert will pop up upon finishing the rating after hitting the final save button. This section will contribute to 3 total marks (33.33% of individual marks).
Note that the combined total of 6 marks from attendance and 3 marks from the SPARKPLUS assessment will be proportionally scaled to a final score of 1, where 1 represents 100% of the individual assignment mark. The final student mark will be calculated as:
Final Mark = Group Report Mark × Individual Report Mark.
INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT MARKING CRITERIA Section
Description
Marks (%)
Standards of
Conduct for Student Project
• Sign the Standards of Conduct for Student Project. • Submit it by the specified deadline on Sunday of Week 1; a 10% penalty for Assessment 1 will be applied to late submission.
• No marks will be awarded for Assessment 1 if submitted after the due date of Assessment 1.
HURDLE
Participation
(Weeks 1-3)
• Ensure punctual attendance for all lectures and tutorials. • Provide screenshots of attendance records for Weeks 1-3 at the weekly lectures and tutorials, as recorded on AMS.
66.67%
SPARKPLUS Self & Peer Assessment (Weeks 1-3)
• Complete the SPARKPLUS Self and Peer Assessment with justified ratings.
• Submit a full-screen screenshot as proof of completion. • Failure to justify ratings incurs a 50% penalty, and non submission results in a zero mark.
• Your score is based on team evaluations, moderated by the lecturer and tutor based on weekly progress and individual contributions during lectures and tutorials.
33.33%
Total
100% (1)
INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT MARKING RUBRIC Grades
=80%
High Distinction
70%-79%
Distinction
60% – 69%
Credit
50% – 59%
Pass
<50%
Fail
Standards of Conduct for Student
Project or
Practical
Placement
HURDLE
A 10% penalty will be applied for late submissions of Assessment 1 from Week 1 to Week 3. No marks will be awarded for Assessment 1 if submitted after Week 3.
Participation (Weeks 1-3)
Punctual
attendance for all lectures
and tutorials.
Generally
punctual
attendance
for most
lectures and
tutorials.
Attendance
for lectures
and tutorials is somewhat inconsistent; punctuality
needs
improvement.
Inconsistent attendance
for lectures
and tutorials with frequent tardiness.
Poor
attendance
and
punctuality for lectures and
tutorials.
SPARKPLUS Self & Peer
Assessment (Weeks 1-3)
Exceptional
self
awareness,
insightful peer evaluation,
constructive
feedback,
strong
teamwork
capability, and critical
thinking.
Strong self
awareness,
thoughtful
peer
evaluation,
relevant
feedback,
good
teamwork
capability, and solid critical thinking.
Moderate
self
awareness,
reasonable
peer
evaluation,
basic
feedback,
satisfactory
teamwork
capability, and some critical thinking.
Limited self
awareness,
basic peer
evaluation,
minimal
feedback,
adequate
teamwork
capability, and minimal
critical
thinking.
Lacks self
awareness,
minimal peer evaluation, no feedback,
poor
teamwork
capability, and no critical
thinking.
Standards of Conduct for Student Project I, [Your Name], am undertaking in an industry-based project or placement to gain insights into the workplace environment or business operations. Recognising my role as a student at [Your Institution], I acknowledge the necessity to adhere to the following standards of appropriate workplace conduct during my time on the job.
a. I will perform all work allocated to me to the best of my abilities.
b. I will be punctual and conscientious in the fulfilling of my project responsibilities. c. I will conduct myself in a respectful, courteous, and cooperative manner.
d. I will discuss any concerns, issues, or suggestions with my project supervisor or team. e. I will follow all project guidelines, including timelines, documentation, and team agreements. f. I will notify my supervisor or team promptly if I am unable to attend a meeting or complete a task on time.
g. I will attend all scheduled supervision meetings with the industry client and carry out project tasks as agreed with the team.
h. I will avoid behaviour that may disrupt the progress of the project, including unnecessary noise or distractions.
i. I will use communication tools and resources responsibly and professionally. j. I will respect team members’ input and provide constructive feedback.
k. I will accept guidance and supervision from the industry client or supervisor/tutor. l. I will refrain from bringing unrelated personal matters into project discussions. m. I will avoid discussing sensitive topics unrelated to the project that may cause discomfort to others.
o. I will contact my academic tutor at the Melbourne Institute of Technology (MIT) if I need help resolving any issues related to my project.
p. I understand that all intellectual property rights developed by me during the student project are assigned to and vest in MIT, and MIT may use these for academic or research purposes without providing credit to me.
q. I will keep any confidential information related to the project secure and not disclose it without permission.
Students are expected to uphold these standards in the same spirit as professional team members. If uncertain, always seek guidance from your project supervisor/tutor.
Signed: _________________________________________ Date: _______________________ Student’s Name
